Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Congress Must Handle Off-Label Talk Restrictions Carefully, Experts Tell Lawmakers

Executive Summary

Two House Energy & Commerce Committee members have introduced legislation to provide clarity and more latitude in off-label communications by manufacturers about devices and drugs, and a panel of legal experts and physicians provided feedback on the topic to the committee's Health subpanel July 12.

You may also be interested in...



US FDA User-Fee Bill Swiftly Passes US House, Now Moves To Senate

The FDA Reauthorization Act, which would reauthorize the MDUFA IV user-fee agreement and enact additional device regulatory reforms, passed the US House July 12 on a unanimous vote. Lawmakers applauded the bill's inclusion of device facility inspection reforms and an over-the-counter hearing aid provisions. The legislation now moves to the Senate, where a crowded legislative schedule could mean delayed consideration.

House Committee Advances User Fees With Full Slate Of Device Amendments

House Energy and Commerce Committee members added a slate of industry-favored device amendments into the FDA Reauthorization Act before sending the bill to the chamber floor, including reforms targeting device accessories, medical imaging and post-market surveillance.

Unapproved Indications Guidance Proves Controversial

US FDA has collected more than 100 comments on a pair of draft guidance documents about manufacturer speech relating to unapproved devices or information not listed in device labeling. A document allowing manufacturers to disseminate some information not in the labeling drew fire from both sides, with patient groups worrying the change could pose a risk to the public, while trade groups saying the communication protections were still too narrow.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT105162

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel